Why Viscosity Matters
WHEN IT COMES TO MOULD COOLING
TURBULENT FLOW & VISCOSITY MATTERS!
Copyright, Burger & Brown Engineering, Inc., November 6, 2009
Written by Philip M. Burger, P.E.
In Collaboration with Doug Thorpe, Director of Process Training, Nypro University, Clinton, Massachusetts
Technical Assistance on Water Treatment by Rick Lorfing, Water Improvement Services, Kansas City, KS
Phil Burger is the founder of Burger & Brown Engineering, Inc. in Grandview, MO and currently serves as Director of Product Development.
Technical moulders know that turbulent cooling flow can improve cycle times and help the bottom line. Here are some factors that can inhibit good cooling and also some thoughts on how you can improve your mould cooling results.
Turbulent Flow 101
As flow velocity increases to a critical speed in cooling channels, the flow begins to swirl and mix vigorously. This condition is known as turbulent flow. Turbulence increases heat transfer by virtue of the mixing and faster flow at the boundaries of the coolant and steel. Turbulent flow may be predicted with a simple calculation to determine a Reynolds number.
Reynolds Number = (Velocity x diameter) / viscosity
According to the “STANDARD HANDBOOK FOR MECHANICAL ENGINEERS” by Baumeister & Marks, “above a Reynolds number of 4000, the flow is generally turbulent”. I have rearranged the expression to solve for the flow rate needed for turbulence based on a Reynolds number of 4000 and the use of convenient units. The new equation is:
GPM=117,495 x d (inches) x kv (units of Ft.² / sec.)
This simply says that the larger the pipe and the higher the kinematic viscosity, the more flow you need for turbulence. Kinematic viscosity is the English unit of viscosity (ft.²/sec.). Using this expression, Burger & Brown Engineering developed the following Turbulent Flow Reference Chart. It has been provided to the industry free of charge for many years.
The Viscosity Variable It is important to realize that kinematic viscosity of the coolant increases significantly as the temperature decreases. Add some antifreeze and the viscosity increase becomes dramatic. Figure 1 shows the effects of both temperature and ethylene glycol (a common antifreeze compound) on kinematic viscosity.
Consider this example. For a ½" dia. flow passage in a mould with water at 60°F, it takes about .5 GPM to get turbulent flow. But what if you are using a coolant of 30% ethylene glycol in water at 40°F? Figure 2 shows that you now need a flow rate of around 2.4 times greater or about 1.2 GPM to get turbulent flow in a single cooling circuit. Now, imagine that you have a dozen cooling connections on an average mould and your plant has 24 moulding machines. You can begin to see the implications.
Heat Capacity Issue Another property of antifreeze compounds that should be considered is their lower specific heat capacity. The specific heat capacity is the amount of heat required to change a unit mass of a substance by one degree in temperature. Think of specific heat as the capacity of a substance to hold or carry heat. Ethylene and propylene glycol have slightly less than 60% of the heat capacity of water. A solution of 30% ethylene glycol in water will have about 90% of the heat carrying capacity of water.
Conventional Wisdom? It is easy to assume that colder is better for mould cooling fluid. But to run coolant at 45°F or lower you must add glycol to the water to prevent evaporator coil freezing in the chiller. That means you will need more than double the flow to get turbulent conditions. Taken on a plant wide basis, this can tax the available coolant pumping capacity. If pumping capacity is limited are you better off with 100% water at a higher temperature, requiring less than half the flow to be turbulent?
Cost Considerations? Low temperature coolant (requiring antifreeze) costs extra in several ways. First, there is the cost of the antifreeze and the ongoing cost to replenish it as makeup coolant is added. Next, there is the additional operating cost of refrigerating to lower temperatures. There are capital and operating costs associated with the additional pumping capacity needed for the more viscous coolant. Other costs can result from degraded part quality associated with very cold, sweaty moulds. Ethylene glycol is toxic and also poses a health and an environmental risk in the event of a serious spill.
A Little Experiment We performed a real world experiment in our in-house moulding department to demonstrate measurable effects of antifreeze solution vs. water coolant. We used a small 8 cavity mould that makes a polypropylene nut. We installed a thermocouple in the cavity plate to sense the steel temperature near the cavities. We started the mould with 100% water circulating at 60°F at a flow rate sufficient for turbulence. After an hour of running, the steel temperature stabilized at 78°F. We stopped the machine and added glycol to the chiller to a concentration of about 40%. We restarted the mould at the same coolant flow rate and temperature. As the process stabilized, the steel temperature rose to 83°F. Moulded part temperatures were running around 8 degrees warmer than with water cooling. This clearly indicates a reduction of cooling capacity caused by the combination of increased viscosity and reduced heat capacity of the coolant.
Water Treatment Considerations Water quality is another important factor in the performance of coolant circulating systems. Water chemistry can affect cooling in these ways:
•Microbiological Issues – Microbiological Influenced Corrosion (MIC) is caused by the corrosive effects of microbiological growth on metal components. Fouling of heat transfer surfaces can occur. The combined results are restriction of coolant flow and dramatically reduced heat transfer coefficient.
•Scaling – Minerals can precipitate out of water and deposit onto heat transfer surfaces, restricting coolant flow and reducing heat transfer.
•Corrosion – Undesirable water chemistry can attack metal components of the system. MIC, mentioned earlier, is one type of corrosion. Galvanic Corrosion can occur from electrical interaction of different metals with the coolant.
The use of ethylene or propylene glycol complicates the water treatment process. Glycols are known to make the water more corrosive. Some glycols have corrosion inhibitor packages added to them. The question is, “Are they right for the specific metal components of your system?” Low levels of glycol can encourage microbiological growth in the system water.
Water treatment issues are unique to each system due to the chemistry of the local water supply and individual plant conditions. The Association of Water Technologies is a professional association dedicated to the water treatment industry. They provide training and technical information and can assist you in reaching a local water treatment professional.
In Conclusion I have argued before that improving mould cooling is the “low hanging fruit” in improving profits. Take the time to know how much flow you need for turbulence and measure the flow in each cooling circuit. Establish minimum flow rates for all cooling circuits and incorporate this information into setup sheets.
Please click here to view our range of product to help you measuring flow rates in mould cooling
This information is provided solely as a service to our customers, and in no way infers any liabilty on the part of Burger & Brown Engineering Inc, Invotec Solutions Limited its representatives, or distributors.